We knew the time was coming, and it is here. The first real attack on Sarah Palin has arrived.
Being the conservatarian that I am, I am voting for McCain/Palin, but I must say that stumbling on the definition of the Bush Doctrine is definitely a fair issue to bring up. I thought her response definitely left a bad impression because she did not know what this doctrine was. I knew that slip up would be hammered by the Obama side (and quite honestly, she should be examined on her readiness).
However, being willing to defend in principle the fact that “doing whatever it takes” is always on the table shows that she is a proponent of the doctrine, because it is common sense. ‘Strike them first before they kill us’, which is the essence of the Bush Doctrine, is completely proper and common sense. Even if she did not know what the term itself meant, she still possesses the right perpsective when it comes to protecting our country. Any intellectual can spout definitions, but it takes having well defined principles within yourself to know what to do ‘without blinking’.
Obama is willing to sit down with terrorists without preconditions. I am sure Obama knows what the Bush Doctrine is, but because of the way he responds in principle to defending our country, he is all wrong for the safety and security of this country. He knows what the Bush Doctrine is. Sarah Palin did not. But she had it in her heart, in principle. Therefore, I still feel better about Sarah Palin than I do about Barak Obama and Joe Biden any day.
http://theconservatarian.blogivists.com/2008/09/11/defending-sarah-palin-round-one/
2 responses so far ↓
1 Sean Braisted (2 comments) // Sep 11, 2008 at 6:17 pm
“‘Strike them first before they kill us,” and which politician in America would say otherwise? The question isn’t whether we strike first before they kill us, but whether we will strike because we feel they might someday be a threat to us.
2 Conservatarian (7 comments) // Sep 11, 2008 at 7:17 pm
And how far does one have to go by feelings? At least George Bush went in on evidence he was given (though it did turn out to be faulty). This is the reason Israel would be justified in a preemptive strike on Iran’s pre-nuclear capabilities. Not only does Israel FEEL that Iran is a threat, they have evidence. Obama has evidence, and wants to talk to terrorists and rogue nations without preconditions.
Leave a Comment